OhioIndependent Redistricting Commission
Campaign Status: Loss
Outcome
Voters in Ohio rejected Question 1 (53.8% against, 46.2% in favor)
The Policy
Question 1: Independent Redistricting Commission
✅ Good for voters: Independent redistricting commissions take the political map drawing power out of the hands of politicians and their allies and are proven to draw fairer maps, giving voters more power and leading to more competitive elections.
Background
Lawmakers in Ohio get to draw their own voting districts, pick their voters and protect their incumbents. After the last census, the Ohio Supreme Court had to reject not one, not two, but five sets of unconstitutionally gerrymandered maps in what Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor called “a stunning rebuke of the rule of law”. The people of Ohio deserve better, and they demanded it with the Citizens Not Politicians Amendment. This new law would have 1) created an independent citizen’s redistricting commission, 2) banned current or former politicians, political party officials and lobbyists from sitting on the Commission, 3) required fair maps by prohibiting voting districts that favor any political party or individual, and 4) required an open and transparent process.
Who’s Involved?
GET INVOLVED
You can make a difference no matter where you live.
The Latest On This Campaign
Anti-Gerrymandering Groups Warn That Ohio’s Ballot Language Is Misleading Voters
Oct 28 2024
If “yes” on Issue 1 wins, it’d create an independent redistricting process. But some voters are saying the GOP-crafted ballot summary tricked them into opposing a reform they support.
Read MoreYES ON ISSUE 1 to ban politicians and lobbyists from manipulating voting district lines
Oct 22 2024
Former Ohio Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor brings down the gavel on the shameless lying politicians in a powerful new Yes on 1 ad now airing statewide.
Read MoreOhio lawsuit seeks rewrite of redistricting ballot language dubbed ‘biased, inaccurate, deceptive’
Aug 20 2024
The Ohio Supreme Court should step in on behalf of voters and order a rewrite of ballot language for a fall redistricting measure that “may be the most biased, inaccurate, deceptive, and unconstitutional” the state has ever seen, argues a lawsuit filed late Monday.
Read More