How Money Influences Elections

The vast amount of money flowing through our elections can sway not only who wins, but also who even gets to run. This influx of cash can lead to unequal representation and raises fundamental questions about the integrity of our democratic process.

We’re leading the movement to fix America’s broken political system.

It costs a F#CK TON of money to win an election

Want to run for the U.S. House of Representatives and serve your neighbors? Do you have $2 million dollars? That’s about what it’ll cost you to win an election for a House seat.

Want to run for the U.S. Senate and serve the people of your great state? It’ll cost you about $20 million to win.

Nearly 94% of House candidates and 82% of Senate candidates that outspent their opponents won their elections.

In 2020, over $14 billion was spent on all federal elections, making it the most expensive election cycle in U.S. history (so far).

Why does it cost so much to run for office?

It’s a complex beast to run for office. If you want to win, you’ve got to consider:

  • Advertising & Influence: You’ll want to run effective television, radio and social media ads to get your message and qualifications out there to as many voters as possible
  • Campaign Infrastructure & Staffing: You’ll need skilled staff who can do media buys, coordinate campaign activities, recruit volunteers, give you good advice, and more. These people might have salaries, travel costs, and other expenses.
  • Voter Mobilization and Outreach: Money lets you put on events and rallies that can generate media coverage and energize supporters. Money lets you send mail to potential supporters and lets you call and text them asking for their support.
  • Reach and Polling: Knowing how you’re polling in the race, which demographics of voters you need to get your message in front of, and research on your opposition can give you the edge you need to win. And none of it is cheap.

Whoever has the most money usually wins

Not exactly a groundbreaking insight, is it?

Sure, a candidate may be the incumbent and have an advantage with built-in name recognition, or they could catch fire for speaking out about a particular issue and get free media coverage, or perhaps they have a magnetic personality that allows them to attract many willing volunteers and build an exciting ground game.

But, at the end of the day, it’s really all about the money: nearly 94% of House candidates and 82% of Senate candidates that outspent their opponents won their elections.

So where’s all this campaign money coming from?

For the most part, most candidates, regardless of party affiliation, are getting upwards of 70% of their money from corporations, special interest groups, or wealthy individuals.

Common sources of campaign cash include:

  • Small-dollar donations: Contributions typically less than $200, often collected through online platforms and grassroots fundraising efforts.
  • Large-dollar donations: Contributions exceeding $200, often from wealthier individuals.
  • Self-funding: Candidates can use their personal wealth to finance their campaigns, like Mike Bloomberg who spent $1 billion of his own money on his presidential campaign.
  • Political Action Committees (PACs) and Super PACs:
    • PACs: Organizations that collect funds from members and donate them to campaigns. There are different types of PACs like corporate PACs, labor PACs, and ideological PACs.
    • Super PACs: Super PACs can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money to support or oppose candidates. Since 2010, the amount of money spent by Super PACs has exploded.

How money can affect the outcome of ballot measures

In the same way that money affects the outcome of candidate races, it also has a profound impact on the outcomes of ballot measures that people vote on at the local and state levels.

Ballot measures can be introduced to the public for voting either by legislatures or through citizen-initiated processes. These citizen ballot initiatives are one of the purest forms of American democracy. They allow citizens to get the issues they care about placed on the ballot and voted on by the people, often in cases where politicians fail to act.

► 17 ballot measures from history that might never have become law Learn more »

Just as with candidates; special interest groups, corporations, and wealthy individuals often invest heavily in advertising, campaign infrastructure, voter outreach, and polling to tip the scales of a ballot measure vote in their favor.

Infamous Examples of Money Influencing Politics

  • CA Prop 22

    California Proposition 22 (2020)

    • Background: Proposition 22 would classify gig economy workers as “independent contractors” rather than “employees”, exempting companies from having to provide the state-mandated benefits owed to employees.
    • Influence: Companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash spent over $200 million to support Proposition 22, which classified gig economy workers as independent contractors.
    • Outcome: The $200 million spent in support of Proposition 22 made it the most expensive ballot measure campaign in California history and led to the passage of the measure.
  • NYC Mayor’s Race

    New York City Mayor’s Race (2009)

    • Background: Michael Bloomberg, in his quest for a third term as NYC Mayor, ended up spending over $100 million of his own money on re-election.
    • Influence: He outspent his opponent 14 to 1, and his money allowed for many last-minute television ads, radio ads, and phone calls to registered voters right before election day.
  • WI Recall Election

    Wisconsin Gubernatorial Recall Election (2012)

    • Background: Organizers opposed Governor Scott Walker’s agenda and collected 900,000 signatures to initiate a recall election process. Democrat Tom Barrett ran against Scott Walker in the recall election.
    • Influence: Scott Walker raised $30.5 million (⅔ of which came from donors outside of Wisconsin) while his opponent Tom Barrett raised only $3.9 million.
    • Outcome: The amount of money that Scott Walker was able to raise and therefore spend gave him a significant advantage over his opponent and allowed him to win his raise.
  • WA Initiative 522

    Washington Initiative 522 (2013)

    • Background: Washington’s Initiative 522 would have required foods containing genetically engineered ingredients to be labeled as such.
    • Influence: Opponents, including major food and biotechnology companies like Monsanto, DuPont, and Bayer CropScience spent over $22 million to defeat the measure, significantly outspending supporters.
    • Outcome: Thanks to an advertising blitz by the No campaign, the initiative failed with 54.8% voting against it.
  • OH Issue 2

    Ohio Issue 2 (2017)

    • Background: Issue 2 (The Drug Price Relief Act) in Ohio aimed to require that state agencies pay the same or lower prices for prescription drugs as the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
    • Outcome: Voters in Ohio overwhelmingly rejected Issue 2 with 80% voting against thanks in part to the virtually unlimited spending that the opponents of Issue 2 had at their disposal.

Are there any solutions?

Yes! As part of our anti-corruption policy platform, we champion a number of effective and politically viable solutions including:

  • Expanding public campaign financing programs
  • Strengthening penalties on attempts to buy political influence
  • Caps on campaign spending
  • Requiring disclosures on sources of major donations
  • Ending dark money
  • Banning campaign spending by foreign-influenced corporations

Since 2012, we’ve scored 185 wins all across the country to pass tough anti-corruption laws like these. See our wins »

To pass these laws, we follow a proven strategy of bypassing the broken Congress to pass tough anti-corruption laws city by city, state by state, limiting the influence of corporations, lobbyists, and special interest groups and their ability to affect regulations.

You Can Make A Difference

Keep Learning

How Do Special Interests Control Our Government?
Jun 10 2024

These groups lobby for their interests, finance political campaigns, and even write the laws that Congress passes... often with minimal transparency.

Learn more
Why is Congressional Stock Trading Legal?
Apr 5 2024

Insider trading is a highly illegal practice, and it could land you up to 25 years in prison… unless you happen to be a member of Congress.

Learn more
Citizens United: A "Super" Sad Anniversary
Jan 19 2024

Is political discourse better today than it was before the 2010 Citizens United ruling? Oof.

Learn more
Santos and the Machine: Why Corruption Thrives in our Broken System
Nov 29 2023

The Santos saga is a broader indictment of a broken system that enables corruption.

Learn more
How Lobbyists Control Your Taxes
Feb 10 2023

Besides corruption, what’s the number one thing Americans of all political stripes agree on? Doing your taxes sucks.

Learn more
This is how votes are counted and verified in U.S. elections
Nov 2 2022

How does the process of counting votes actually work? Here’s how it happens, and why you can be sure the election results are accurate.

Learn more
The U.S. is an Oligarchy? The Research, Explained
Aug 17 2022

A recent study shows that citizens “have little or no independent influence" on U.S. government policy.

Learn more
How Does Dark Money Work? 7 Top Questions Answered
Jun 15 2021

2020’s presidential election involved a record amount of dark money. Here’s exactly where dark money comes from, what it does, and—most importantly—how to get it out of our elections.

Learn more
Does Your Vote Really Count?
Jun 9 2021

You’ve heard it before — every vote matters. But, it might not always feel like it. Being one vote among millions might feel insignificant, but your voice actually has a huge impact on politicians and the laws they pass. Here’s why you should never miss another election.

Learn more
[chatbot]